Hangover! Proves the theorem of Hollywood’s Sequel Law of movies!

SPOILER ALERT only for the minor group of people who never knew about a movie called Hangover in the past! Well, if you fall under the majority of the world who had seen the part one, there is no question of spoilers here.

It was a real pleasure meeting you!

Fuck Off!

I am thinking about getting my bartender’s license.

Suck my dick!

No, thank you!

I can keep going on with such witty dialogues from the Hangover and I must say I have seen this movie at least 50 times and I never get bored or turn to a different channel. That’s the amount of wittiness the movie had offered you and one who has seen this movie, will definitely expect at least the sequel with an equal pace if not a dull one. But the trailer literally shattered the expectations with unwinding the script, a replica of Las Vegas and with same old missing and hangover with less and boring screenplay.

Las Vegas was awesome.	Bangkok was dull and boring
The wedding boy Doug was missing and it was gripping until they find him.	Bride’s little brother comes in a scene and leaves no interest in the hunt
Stu’s missing tooth is sensational and had a great Dentist touch to it.	Tattoo, give it a break!
Mike Tyson’s tiger! There is a jungle cat in the bathroom. He is not kidding; there is a fucking tiger in the bathroom.	Boring monkey again! With a cameo role, its better Mike could have avoided it.
Jade was well apt for the movie and had a touching end.	QUESTION MARK!
Carlos! And the interesting scenes in the pool side table by Alan. ‘Not at the table Carlos’	Sticking a bottle and making a monkey sucking the penis. Ahhhhh! Please!
Melissa!	We have an empty space here as none at the reception end could make these guys rush for the wedding!
Casino, Roof, Villa Suite, Mike Tyson, Strip club, Wedding, Hospital is equal to LAS VEGAS	I will have to watch the movie again to recollect the places. Most of them which I could remember were the Dull gloomy hotel.
The approach of recollect the last night by enquiring different people with little evidences made the screenplay thrilling and captivating.	I was blown in the scene when the monk asked to meditate so that they can recollect the past!

I didn’t want to draw a comparison at all. But I had a thought if it would attract the people who had not seen the part one! But, I certainly don’t think it would be that appealing and interesting as the part one offered us. And for the people who had watched part one and a fan of part one, I certainly thought of leaving the theatre much quicker than the climax.

As I mentioned, rather than focusing on the title and standing on the same story with absolutely same casting, they must have thought something different to make it fresh and entertaining. Hangover is certainly not a worthy peg!